This is a bit of a pie in the sky conversation as I am not buying a new system for a few months (maybe next summer?). But I am thinking of switching over to Apple for the next system (maybe) and I also want to buy a pre-built system instead of hassling with the build myself. As I look right now, a fairly well loaded Mac Mini with Core i5 is $1100 vs $1600 for a similar iMac. That leaves $500 to buy a new monitor/software. As far as I can tell, there is no real disadvantage to this idea. Am I missing a crucial difference between the Mac Mini and iMac other than a built in screen? Use is 70% photo editing, 20% web development, and 10% video editing. Unless your needs are that great (e.g.: first-person-shooter gaming, heavy duty Photoshop, video editing, etc.) I find that the Mini is quite adequate for most people. Thermocalc cracked. It does become a bit more of an issue if you've already got the monitor, keyboard & mouse. I've been using a late 2007 15' MacBook Pro which is beginning to feel a bit sluggish - 2.2Ghz Core 2 Duo & NVidia GeForce 8600M GT graphics, with an external graphics display, etc. I don't need a laptop professionally - I'm not a pro photographer - so I'm not planning on getting another MacBook Pro. For any casual mobile usage I may want, my iPad (1) will do just fine. I agree that the specs of the iMac are better, but the the new Mac Mini is a lot cheaper and would in any case be a significant step up from where I am now. There may well be a of of people in a similar situation. I am a MAC addict. I run my business on Apples and have for many years. I have an iMac (full house with the 16GB of RAM and 2 TB drive. It all backs up through an X-serve to 24 TB of RAID 5 memory. I have a Mac Mini to manage my music and some of my images. I also drive three monitors with the two systems -- two 27s with the iMac (one native and the other next to it). All of the Macs are wonderful, stable CPUs with long useful lives. The primary difference you will find between the iMac and the Mini for photography is in speed of processing. If you run CS5 and have large files (my typical RAW image is about 20MB) and you take a lot of pictures, you will soon run out of disk space on the Mini. You should get yourself an inexpensive external drive (1TB or larger) for both backup and to hold your images. If you will be doing any stitching, you may have birthdays while the Mini is processing. I suggest watching for Apple to introduce the next generation and buy the previous one. You will experience some small savings, but it is all you will get from Apple. I just bought an iMac because I think at this point the price difference from other Mac systems make the iMacs in general give you the most bang for the buck. I had an 4-year old Mac Mini before with only 2 GB of RAM, but it ran Photoshop CS3 more than adequately. I installed CS5.5 on it before upgrading to the iMac, and everything seemed to work just fine. I think the newer Minis would do just fine and they do take up very little space on your physical desktop. Mine is still chugging away with Leopard for my older PPC programs, if I need them. The 27' monitor is an incredible improvement over my older, individual monitors, and for a while, I have more than enough desktop for everything. Download baseball superstars 2013 hack. Mods Apk usually allow players to unlock all levels, create new units made by fans or add resources in some offline games. You can download Baseball Superstars® 2013 mod free from link given below with no cost and no lockers. *** Details: – Baseball Superstars® 2013 mod apk for Android – Mod for Version: 1.2.2 – Android Version: 2.3.3 and up – Test Baseball Superstars® 2013 apk mod free by clicking the button given below. Just ordered a brand new (unopened box) mid 2010 Mac Mini 2.4ghz C2D with 320GB HD, 256MB shared VRam and built in optical drive with a Kingston 8GB Ram kit from Amazon for $611. I'm not looking for screaming fast processing of tons of images and other media. Already have the keyboard and mouse from my previous 2004 G5 iMac that recently died and still have my $300 Dell 2209WA IPS panel LCD I never used until now. Guess I did what John Ellingson suggested and bought the previous generation Apple product. Don't know where Zach is getting $1100 for the Mac Mini. If you're running a business and need reliable and fast computer horsepower, I'ld think you'ld have to go with a used Mac Pro or new iMac. I have no idea how fast the previous gen. Mac Mini's are but they've got to be a lot faster than my 2004 20' G5 iMac and I thought that was fast editing Raw 6MP files in CS3 Photoshop. ![]() ![]() I never filled up its 160GB HD. I've only accumulated a little over 20GB of images. I actually, buy my Macs for business from the top of the line new equipment, but for personal use I'm usually more than satisfied with the recent generation, but new equipment. I've done that for years. I have to say that for years I ran Apple and Windows equipment side by side, but in the long run the Apple products were cheaper to own over the lifecycle of the products. More expensive to purchase, but 50% longer life cycle and far cheaper to support with much more up time. I'm also in a secure environment and it is far cheaper and easier to keep the Apple system secure than the leaky Windows system ever was.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |